I've still been working on tweaking out my FreeBSD-based 6 Disk ZFS setup. It's mainly going to be used for file storage and so it had crossed my mind that perhaps it would be best to use some type of filesystem level compression. Initially, as in all of the tutorials, I was going to use gzip. However, with a small amount of googling I discovered that LZJB compression is far superior in most cases. In fact, because it's cpu and memory utilization is so low, LZJB outperforms an uncompressed filesystem under many circumstances. This is mainly due to fewer bytes being read or written to the disk. Also, with the 2x-3x compression, I can easily bump up my redundancy from two to three copies of important files with almost no cost.
The real question is, is my compressed data more susceptible to corruption? Of course, the answer to this is yes. Each bit is holding more information and so flipping it causes more information to be lost. It seems to me though that the triple parity more than offsets this. I just need to remember to set a zfs scan on crontab.
Truthfully, using compression in a filesystem leaves me a bit uneasy under any circumstances. I lost more than one installation to stacker and diskdoubler corruption back in the day. It may not have been a lot of bytes I lost, but those bbs lists and space quest save files were worth a lot more to me then than any image or music file is to me now.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Evernote API
A while back I was complaining about some of the shortcomings I felt Evernote could easily fix. Well, it turns out I was wrong about some things. While they don't make it obvious anywhere inside the Evernote client app, its entire data interface is exposed.
I'm quite tempted to try and roll my own memory resident capture app based on the following:
If had the time, I'd really like to make a note reading/taking app as well. Some ideas:
I'm quite tempted to try and roll my own memory resident capture app based on the following:
- It's easy to find out which files a process has locked
- In many cases, it's possible to find out which file contains the data being noted and where it comes from.
- I want a more intuitive way to select a target notebook at capture time.
If had the time, I'd really like to make a note reading/taking app as well. Some ideas:
- Better note organization
- Private-Public encrypted note sections with a key store and auto decrypt.
- Integration with my Outlook GTD system.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
A Personal GTD and Ubiquitous Capture Review
I thought it would be a good idea to do a public reevaluation of my current GTD/Ubiquitous Capture system and maybe get some feedback. I would love to hear any constructive suggestions on how I might improve it further or comments about how you take care of these issues differently using your own system.
Categorization and Evaluation Systems
- Already in a digital system.
- Waiting to be put into a digital system.
- Events (Business/Personal) and (Importance)
- Tasks (Business/Personal) and (Category)
- Ideas
- Contacts (Business/Personal) and (Links)
- Communications (Phone/IM/Email)
- General Data (Documents/Pictures/Videos)
- Perfect - Always works
- Great - Mostly works without issue
- Good - Works with occasional issue
- Poor - Works with constant, frustrating issue
- Useless - Does not work
Physical Systems in Play
VX6700 Windows Mobile Phone:
Capture/GTD Software:
- Default Mobile Office
- Events - Great - If it gets into my phone, I'll be there.
- Tasks - Poor - Interface is much too difficult to use.
- Ideas - Poor - Much too slow. Input style is very limiting. Interface is crappy.
- Contacts - Good - Has difficulty dealing with quantity. Metadata is difficult to access.
- Communications - Good - Makes phone calls fairly well, Texts are doable. Email is painful to use.
- General Data - Useless - Not enough storage space. Document viewing is terrible.
- Automatic Sync With Work and Home PC
- Extreme Portability
- Sluggish Input
- Tiny, Low Res Screen
- Very Limited Storage
- Useless Camera
- Limited to 2 Sync Targets
- Only Friendly with Office
- If the battery fails, I have no phone.
Eee PC 1000 (Windows):
Capture/GTD Software:
- Evernote
- Google Apps
- Events - Useless - Most often in standby
- Tasks - Good - Interface is usable but slow to access due to small keys and trackpad.
- Ideas - Good - Evernote is the best idea capture I've found yet. It Still sucks.
- Contacts - Poor - Does not sync well with my Windows Mobile Phone (not enough sync targets).
- Communications - Great - With Wifi, everything on the net. Even phone with Skype.
- General Data - Poor - Often in standby. If I forget to sync, I don't have my stuff.
- Long Battery Life (10 Hours+)
- Heavy Web Integration, Evernote and Gmail Syncing
- Cannot connect to Windows Mobile Phone (Not Enough Sync Targets)
Dual-Monitor Desktop (Office):
Capture/GTD:
- Outlook 2007
- Jello Dashboard
- OneNote 2007
- Pidgin
- SharePoint (MOSS)
- Events - Poor - Always seem to pop up in batches. Frequently interrupts me while doing work.
- Tasks - Great - Smooth task evaluation and management. However, Jello Dashboard is really ugly.
- Ideas - Good - While OneNote is really flexible, it also takes a lot of time to figure out how to do anything.
- Contacts - Good - Even with Xobni, it's difficult to keep people and data associated strongly. For example, If you forget a name, good luck finding that person. It's also difficult to distinguish my personal contacts from business.
- Communications - Poor - Pidgin looks nice but frequently crashes.
- General Data - Poor - Because SharePoint does not like files that aren't documents, I'm often forced to keep different parts of projects inside SharePoint while others are kept in folders. The biggest issues here are code and compiled programs.
- Fast Task Management
- Easy Collaboration (for some kinds of data)
- Office is often very slow.
- Office is bad at keeping data associations.
- My contacts are a terrible mess.
- My desktop is often cluttered with way too many programs which are all part of some activity categorically. It frustrates me to no end that I have no way to associate them and optimize my work.
Notecards in Back Pocket:
Information Management Ratings By Type:
- Events - Poor - I did the Hipster PDA thing in college, it only worked because I obsessively checked it.
- Tasks - Poor - Lists are hard to order on paper. Often tasks wont make the leap from here to Office/Google.
- Ideas - Great - No limitations other than the size of the card. The only difficulty is digital capture/organizing.
- Contacts - Poor - Just as with Tasks, it's difficult to sort on paper.
- Communications - Useless - They are even hard to throw at people.
- General Data - Useless - I once had this software that would let you print binary data as dots and then read it with a scanner. It was pretty much just for fun though.
- It's easy to convey ideas with the freedom of paper.
- Paper makes for poor integration.
Conclusions
Software Packages Most Frequently Used:- Microsoft Office 2007, Mobile and MOSS - Office Email/Contacts/Tasks/Events
- Evernote - Ideas/Notes/Clippings
- Google - Email/Calendar
Worst Covered Area: Misc Data, Physical Documents
Resolving Major Difficulties with My System
1. Digitizing/Categorizing paper and notecards takes a lot of time and so I often avoid it.
Why? I schedule to do notecards and papers both once a week at the same time. At the same time my filing cabinet hasn't been cleaned out or reordered in years and so is slow to use.
Fix: First, make sure all Notecards I care about get digitized and then thrown out. I will put them in a separate, high priority, "Notecard Inbox". Second, I will rework my home filing cabinet, throw out old files, and reevaluate which types of paper to keep for extended periods as well as how to order said paper.
2. Managing several tasks at once on my office computer can be frustrating.
Why? My desktop is always cluttered with active programs.
Fix: Try out a multi-desktop extension tool. I've seen a few of those go by on LifeHacker.
3. Keeping track of which Projects/Events/Tasks/Contacts/Ideas/Data/Paper are related to which is all but impossible.
Why? None of the tools I currently use seem to be designed to be used in that way.
Fix: Explore the possibility of using a relational data management system or a office plugin of some kind.
4. Similarly, searching my Projects/Events/Tasks/Contacts/Ideas/Data/Paper cloud is impossible.
Why? I currently have no software infrastructure in place to do this.
Fix: Give google desktop indexing another try. Now with a second hard disk and extra memory it may have acceptable performance.
5. I frequently don't get around to looking at things I tagged "later".
Why? I have too many systems in place and too much information available.
Fix: Explore the possibility of a system that can track text, videos, audio and paper for queued absorption. It must have a fast interface, be able to sync for offline use, and be usable everywhere.
6. I often have trouble with GTD and Ubiquitous Capture on the go.
Why? My Windows Mobile phone is three years old and just hanging on. It can't run any of the newer software and often suffers from input lag.
Fix: Maybe it's time to get a new phone. Although, I was hoping to hold out for a Windows Mobile phone with both a decent amount of storage and a keyboard to hit the market. I'm starting to feel that it will never come.
Labels:
evernote,
gtd,
Hipster PDA,
infrastructure,
life,
planning,
success,
ubiquitous capture
Friday, February 6, 2009
Getting Some Serious Analytics
I decided tonight to wire up my personal and professional blogs with google analytics. Using it I hope to learn more about what types of posts readers are most interested in so that I can write more along those lines.
Actually, we already use google analytics for our work blogs at Atalasoft. Our whole site is wired up with it. However, the analytics information is only really used for measuring the evaluation funnel by our marketing department. While I could probably see the data if I wanted to, I doubt I'd be able to set up custom goals and such. This is why I added my own additional calls to analytics.
The most difficult part was wiring things up to do tracking of miscellaneous links and buttons. I had to look up each button/link id in firebug and write some javascript to do the onclick assignments. This is the code I ended up using on my work blog:
Anyone get the CIV reference?
Actually, we already use google analytics for our work blogs at Atalasoft. Our whole site is wired up with it. However, the analytics information is only really used for measuring the evaluation funnel by our marketing department. While I could probably see the data if I wanted to, I doubt I'd be able to set up custom goals and such. This is why I added my own additional calls to analytics.
The most difficult part was wiring things up to do tracking of miscellaneous links and buttons. I had to look up each button/link id in firebug and write some javascript to do the onclick assignments. This is the code I ended up using on my work blog:
function SetYourGoals()
{
if (typeof(_gat) != "object") { return false; }
if (!document.getElementById) { return false; }
var googlePageTracker = _gat._getTracker("??-???????-?");
googlePageTracker._trackPageview();
var myGoogleGoals = new Array();
myGoogleGoals['bp___v___bt___s___rss'] = "/goal/feed";
myGoogleGoals['bp___v___bt___s___atom'] = "/goal/feed";
myGoogleGoals['bp___v___bt___s___email'] = "/goal/feed";
myGoogleGoals['bp___v___bs___lcl___Categories_ctl02_Links_ctl01_Link'] = "/goal/personalmisc";
myGoogleGoals['bp___v___bs___lcl___Categories_ctl02_Links_ctl02_Link'] = "/goal/personalmisc";
myGoogleGoals['bp___v___bs___lcl___Categories_ctl02_Links_ctl03_Link'] = "/goal/personalblog";
for (var i in myGoogleGoals)
{
var ahref = document.getElementById(i);
ahref.onclick = function()
{
try
{
googlePageTracker._trackPageview(myGoogleGoals[i]);
}
catch (err)
{
}
return false;
}
}
}
function AsyncSetYourGoals()
{
window.setTimeout(SetYourGoals, 5000);
return false;
}
Anyone get the CIV reference?
Thursday, February 5, 2009
FreeBSD ZFS Running Strong, Rocking Hard
I decided about a month ago to back up my current Ubuntu-based file server and put ZFS with raidz on it. Tonight, I finally got around to doing it. If you haven't heard about ZFS or Raidz, I suggest being ready to have your mind blown.
I've been a FreeBSD user on and off since about 2.6. Initially, I only chose it because I wanted the help of all of my FreeBSD guru buddies on IRC (I really should drop in and say hi to those guys, it's been too long). It really grew on me though. I feel extremely comfortable with it's kernel, filesystem layout and ports system.
That's why I was so happy to hear that it supported ZFS out of the box in 7.0. However, after a bit of research and reading about all the tuning necessary and how out of date the FreeBSD 7.1 branch of ZFS was, I thought I'd go to the source instead. I decided to try OpenSolaris.
Unfortunately, OpenSolaris 2008.11 refused to boot. It would get to the copyright notice and just lock up solid. I messed around with it and tried some kernel flags but nothing seemed to help. In the end I went back to my old friend FreeBSD.
The last version I used was 5.0 as a file server in my dorm room. One of the best things about FreeBSD is it has a winning formula and it hasn't changed much in all of the years i've used it. I just picked it up and everything was right where I remembered it being. Microsoft could learn from this example of strong consistency (cough, office2007-vista-windows 7, cough).
The only issue I ran into is lack of support for my integrated NIC. I didn't feel too bad about that though. The server is running on an old AS-ROCK 939Dual-SATA2 motherboard with Realtek RTL8201CL onboard. It's pretty much trash anyway. So I went over to my box of PCI cards, grabbed an old Intel 82558 Pro NIC, and off I went.
After that it was a hop skip and a jump to getting ZFS going. I added the standard lines to my loader.conf to tune for conservative memory usage and sprinkled in some vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.size="5M" to compinsate for my meager one gigabyte of ram. After that simply added zfs_enable="YES" to my rc.conf and off I went. One command and less than a second later it was finished:
I had a full 2TB, 6 drive, double parity raidz array ready to go. Wow.
For an even bigger shock take a walk down memory lane with me and check out what I had to go through to build my RAID-5 array in FreeBSD 5.0. What a pain in the ass that setup was. The funniest part is that it's not even taking into account how software raid in 5.0 would randomly crash or how the raid service would have to be manually started from a command line after each boot.
I've been a FreeBSD user on and off since about 2.6. Initially, I only chose it because I wanted the help of all of my FreeBSD guru buddies on IRC (I really should drop in and say hi to those guys, it's been too long). It really grew on me though. I feel extremely comfortable with it's kernel, filesystem layout and ports system.
That's why I was so happy to hear that it supported ZFS out of the box in 7.0. However, after a bit of research and reading about all the tuning necessary and how out of date the FreeBSD 7.1 branch of ZFS was, I thought I'd go to the source instead. I decided to try OpenSolaris.
Unfortunately, OpenSolaris 2008.11 refused to boot. It would get to the copyright notice and just lock up solid. I messed around with it and tried some kernel flags but nothing seemed to help. In the end I went back to my old friend FreeBSD.
The last version I used was 5.0 as a file server in my dorm room. One of the best things about FreeBSD is it has a winning formula and it hasn't changed much in all of the years i've used it. I just picked it up and everything was right where I remembered it being. Microsoft could learn from this example of strong consistency (cough, office2007-vista-windows 7, cough).
The only issue I ran into is lack of support for my integrated NIC. I didn't feel too bad about that though. The server is running on an old AS-ROCK 939Dual-SATA2 motherboard with Realtek RTL8201CL onboard. It's pretty much trash anyway. So I went over to my box of PCI cards, grabbed an old Intel 82558 Pro NIC, and off I went.
After that it was a hop skip and a jump to getting ZFS going. I added the standard lines to my loader.conf to tune for conservative memory usage and sprinkled in some vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.size="5M" to compinsate for my meager one gigabyte of ram. After that simply added zfs_enable="YES" to my rc.conf and off I went. One command and less than a second later it was finished:
# zpool create pool raidz2 ad4 ad6 ad8 ad10 ad12 ad16
I had a full 2TB, 6 drive, double parity raidz array ready to go. Wow.
For an even bigger shock take a walk down memory lane with me and check out what I had to go through to build my RAID-5 array in FreeBSD 5.0. What a pain in the ass that setup was. The funniest part is that it's not even taking into account how software raid in 5.0 would randomly crash or how the raid service would have to be manually started from a command line after each boot.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Hey Merlin Mann, where's my digital Banker's Box?
I've been a 43folders fan for quite a while. In college the hipster pda rescued me from procrastination and made me a mean lean work machine. However, lately I've moved more into the GTD camp as I have the power of outlook available to me both at my desk and on my phone.
It may then come to no surprise to you that I was excited to hear Merlin Mann was giving a talk at MacWorld. Earlier today I watched his talk "Toward Patterns for Creativity" on youtube and while I didn't find it to have much content I wasn't already familiar with, one thing stood out: The Banker's Box.
The Banker's Box is a place where everything relating to a project (or context) goes. This way, while juggling several projects it's always possible to find the materials you need. A great idea in the physical world but I wish I had something which could meet that criteria in the virtual one. As it stands I'm using several different applications, each with a specific type of content.
For example, I've been using Evernote as a way to collect notes for a while now, but as an all encompassing "Banker's Box" solution, it's fallen short. The main issue seems to be that the ways I can manage content with Evernote are very limited. These limitations fall into a few categories and are shared by every single piece of software I use:
The first is grabbing content. While Evernote is fantastic at grabbing a chunk of a webpage, it is significantly less good at doing the same inside a PDF file. It can hold any kind of text and so it's entirely possible to put code into it, but it lacks any syntax highlighting and so the code becomes difficult to read. Also, it integrates with almost nothing and is very proprietary. C'mon already Evernote, throw us a bone here. If you were actually able to get a plugin system going and some content sharing standards in place, I'd be willing to actually give you money.
My ideal content collection application would be able to reach into any app I was using, grab my selected content and associate with it the name of the app and the file/location the content was from. I also want to be able to click on something in my content manager and have it take me directly to that data if it's available. While you are at it, also cache the full source of the content. Disk space is super cheap.
The second is management of content. Evernote has a terrible interface for managing a large number of notebooks. I'm only up to 8 and it's already gotten difficult to deal with. It also does not allow any kind of grouping of notebooks. What Evernote needs is contexts. You put notebooks into a context and when you change to that context, it's all right there for you. I also want it to be easy to change contexts on the fly without having to navigate a GUI. I rarely use Evernote's Firefox capture because I'm never sure exactly which notebook it will go into. This is easy to fix with contexts. First make it obvious which context I am in. Second, send to a incoming queue for that context so that I can easily sort it into a notebook at a later time.
The third is archival. In any kind of content management system it should be easy to archive sets of data that may no longer be in use but also may still be useful someday. Really, storage is so cheap and search so good that we should never throw anything away unless keeping it has some kind of associated negative. Yet, I don't want the ghosts of projects past always cluttering what I am working on now. Take a cue from gmail and let me archive things to keep them out of my way but leave them searchable.
The fourth is integration. In the end what I want is a set of tools that integrate my entire life. Why is it that the idea of linking information been so prominent on the web yet on the desktop it's in it's infancy? Every chunk of data in my life should have a unique ID and be able to be referenced from any other chunk of data. I should never have to see or type in this ID, the system should be both implicit in information capture and also intelligent in letting me select from content I would likely want to associate.
Microsoft Office is getting closer (kind of). However, it infuriates me that I need to attach a contact or email to a task or appointment like it's some kind of file. Even worse, if I update that contact's information in my address book the copied information isn't updated. Also, if Microsoft wants to be the one to provide me with my life management solution, it needs to get it's act together around search.
As a software engineer I know that this is all a tall order but I also know that this it is entirely possible. I fear that the only reason we don't already is due to consciously erected anti-competitive barriers. What do we need to make it happen?
Like anyone else, the less I need to worry about my systems the more I can focus on the content I am generating. I'm completely fed up with filling my life with the tons of little steps necessary to move data between applications which simply, just refuse to share data with each other easily because the people who made them want to lock you in. I'm completely willing to jump ship to any products that fulfill my need for open integration and many other feel the same I'm sure. The future is tight but open integration and the sooner it happens the better off we will all be.
Phew, that was quite a rant.
It may then come to no surprise to you that I was excited to hear Merlin Mann was giving a talk at MacWorld. Earlier today I watched his talk "Toward Patterns for Creativity" on youtube and while I didn't find it to have much content I wasn't already familiar with, one thing stood out: The Banker's Box.
The Banker's Box is a place where everything relating to a project (or context) goes. This way, while juggling several projects it's always possible to find the materials you need. A great idea in the physical world but I wish I had something which could meet that criteria in the virtual one. As it stands I'm using several different applications, each with a specific type of content.
For example, I've been using Evernote as a way to collect notes for a while now, but as an all encompassing "Banker's Box" solution, it's fallen short. The main issue seems to be that the ways I can manage content with Evernote are very limited. These limitations fall into a few categories and are shared by every single piece of software I use:
The first is grabbing content. While Evernote is fantastic at grabbing a chunk of a webpage, it is significantly less good at doing the same inside a PDF file. It can hold any kind of text and so it's entirely possible to put code into it, but it lacks any syntax highlighting and so the code becomes difficult to read. Also, it integrates with almost nothing and is very proprietary. C'mon already Evernote, throw us a bone here. If you were actually able to get a plugin system going and some content sharing standards in place, I'd be willing to actually give you money.
My ideal content collection application would be able to reach into any app I was using, grab my selected content and associate with it the name of the app and the file/location the content was from. I also want to be able to click on something in my content manager and have it take me directly to that data if it's available. While you are at it, also cache the full source of the content. Disk space is super cheap.
The second is management of content. Evernote has a terrible interface for managing a large number of notebooks. I'm only up to 8 and it's already gotten difficult to deal with. It also does not allow any kind of grouping of notebooks. What Evernote needs is contexts. You put notebooks into a context and when you change to that context, it's all right there for you. I also want it to be easy to change contexts on the fly without having to navigate a GUI. I rarely use Evernote's Firefox capture because I'm never sure exactly which notebook it will go into. This is easy to fix with contexts. First make it obvious which context I am in. Second, send to a incoming queue for that context so that I can easily sort it into a notebook at a later time.
The third is archival. In any kind of content management system it should be easy to archive sets of data that may no longer be in use but also may still be useful someday. Really, storage is so cheap and search so good that we should never throw anything away unless keeping it has some kind of associated negative. Yet, I don't want the ghosts of projects past always cluttering what I am working on now. Take a cue from gmail and let me archive things to keep them out of my way but leave them searchable.
The fourth is integration. In the end what I want is a set of tools that integrate my entire life. Why is it that the idea of linking information been so prominent on the web yet on the desktop it's in it's infancy? Every chunk of data in my life should have a unique ID and be able to be referenced from any other chunk of data. I should never have to see or type in this ID, the system should be both implicit in information capture and also intelligent in letting me select from content I would likely want to associate.
Microsoft Office is getting closer (kind of). However, it infuriates me that I need to attach a contact or email to a task or appointment like it's some kind of file. Even worse, if I update that contact's information in my address book the copied information isn't updated. Also, if Microsoft wants to be the one to provide me with my life management solution, it needs to get it's act together around search.
As a software engineer I know that this is all a tall order but I also know that this it is entirely possible. I fear that the only reason we don't already is due to consciously erected anti-competitive barriers. What do we need to make it happen?
- Well defined standards for chunking data, referencing data and interchange of data. If I could pick applications I knew could talk and place nice with each other I wouldn't use anything else. I suspect that in general it would be a fantastic competitive advantage for anyone who opted in.
- A unique id for every chunk of data. Given a unique ID, any chunk of data in existence could reference any other. Computers are fast and have tons of memory and so these IDs could be quite large. Part of this ID could easily be related to a person and machine. In this way it would be unnecessary to worry about collisions.
- Caching in the cloud. In this case, I can't help thinking a system like Freenet is the best direction to move in. Everyone would just cache each other's data altruistically, with heavy encryption of course. Even if that's not possible, we could store in the cloud and cache locally. I'm sure many businesses would be willing to perform this service for a nominal fee. At the very least the metadata for everything would be in the cloud. In this way even if you couldn't find the specific chunk, you might be able to find a superset, subset or copy with a different id via search.
Like anyone else, the less I need to worry about my systems the more I can focus on the content I am generating. I'm completely fed up with filling my life with the tons of little steps necessary to move data between applications which simply, just refuse to share data with each other easily because the people who made them want to lock you in. I'm completely willing to jump ship to any products that fulfill my need for open integration and many other feel the same I'm sure. The future is tight but open integration and the sooner it happens the better off we will all be.
Phew, that was quite a rant.
Labels:
43folders,
cloud,
creativity,
evernote,
gtd,
integration,
outlook
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Setting Up The New EEE PC 1000
I just recently got an EEE PC1000. It's cool, it's tiny and it came with linux.
I really like Linux and use it at home on my file server, but it didn't take me long to realize that my career as a Software Engineer using Microsoft products just won't allow me to have a linux only laptop. So today I wiped off Xandros and installed a super slimmed down version of XP.
Future Plans:
I really like Linux and use it at home on my file server, but it didn't take me long to realize that my career as a Software Engineer using Microsoft products just won't allow me to have a linux only laptop. So today I wiped off Xandros and installed a super slimmed down version of XP.
- I started with a heavily stripped down version of XP. I was especally merciless when it came to drivers and services I knew I wouldn't need. It's easy to do with NLite.
- Disabled Prefetching, System Restore, Page File, and The Indexing Service.
- Installed Evernote, Firefox and Open Office
- Installed a few Firefox plugins to make the most of my screen real estate.
Future Plans:
- Update to 2Gb of Ram (Already Ordered)
- Enhace File Caching using CacheSet
- Install 16GB SDHC (Already Ordered) and use it for Swap/Temp Files
- Try out Windows XP Embedded or Perhaps Just Install XPe's Enhanced Write Filter in XP Directly
- Explore Interface Software
- Explore Website, Video and Podcast Caching Software
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
